Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Carrier Sanctions and the Conflicting Legal Obligations of Carriers: Addressing Human Rights...

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Scientific Articles

Carrier Sanctions and the Conflicting Legal Obligations of Carriers: Addressing Human Rights Leakage

Authors:

Theodore Baird ,

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, NL
About Theodore
Theodore Baird worked as post-doctoral researcher from 2013-17.
X close

Thomas Spijkerboer

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, NL; Lund University, SE
About Thomas
Thomas Spijkerboer is professor of Migration law, and Raoul Wallenberg Visiting Professor of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law.
X close

Abstract

Carrier sanctions, by which transport companies are penalised if they do not refuse embarkation to undocumented persons, play a role in perpetuating harms (denial of refugee protection; death) against migrants. They do so because transport companies are obliged to, by legislation of destination states in Europe, North America and Australia. The potential accountability and responsibility of carriers for these harms has not been addressed in literature on human rights law. This article fills this gap through the application of Iris Young’s social connection model to address the contemporary harms of carrier sanctions. We propose that, faced with conflicting legal obligations, carriers have moral and legal obligations to remedy, through strategic actions, the harms to which they contribute. We outline a number of possible practices that carriers can use to do so.

How to Cite: Baird, T. and Spijkerboer, T., 2019. Carrier Sanctions and the Conflicting Legal Obligations of Carriers: Addressing Human Rights Leakage. Amsterdam Law Forum, 11(1), pp.4–19. DOI: http://doi.org/10.37974/ALF.325
17
Views
14
Downloads
Published on 01 Dec 2019.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus