Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Reality of Norms and Reality: A Reply to Fred Grünfeld

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Discussion section

Reality of Norms and Reality: A Reply to Fred Grünfeld

Author:

Michal Onderco

VU University Amsterdam, NL
About Michal
Michal Onderco is a doctoral researcher. His research deals with responses to norm deviance in international relations. He is a former editor and current member of the advisory board of this journal.
X close

Abstract

In a previous issue of this journal Fred Grünfeld argues that while lawyers fail to take into account social reality once a legal norm has been determined, international relations scholars “skip the norm” and research social reality. On the basis of the subsequent demonstrations, Grünfeld contended (quite rightly) that lawyers and social scientists are not familiar with each other’s work, while studying the same phenomena, although in “different phases”. He, however, argues that such division should be kept in place and lawyers and social scientists should remain working separately. In this reply, I will address both the empirical elements of Grünfeld’s argument as well as his substantive argument of keeping the two disciplines separated.

How to Cite: Onderco, M., 2012. Reality of Norms and Reality: A Reply to Fred Grünfeld. Amsterdam Law Forum, 4(1), pp.143–149. DOI: http://doi.org/10.37974/ALF.215
Published on 01 Dec 2012.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus